Skip to content
Independent reporting

Trump Asks Merchan to Delay Sentencing in Lawfare Case Until after November Election

Trump Asks Merchan to Delay Sentencing in Lawfare Case Until after November Election
Share X Facebook Email

(Headline USA) On the heels of a shocking Fox News op-ed warning that corrupt leftist judge Juan Merchan was likely to sentence GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump to jail time, Trumpโ€™s lawyers asked the judge to delay the sentencing until after the November presidential election.

In a letter made public Thursday, Trump lawyer Todd Blanche suggested that sentencing Trump as scheduled on Sept. 18โ€”about seven weeks before Election Dayโ€”would amount to election interference.

Blanche wrote that a delay would also allow Trump time to weigh next steps after the trial judge, Juan M. Merchan, is expected to rule Sept. 16 on the defenseโ€™s request to overturn the verdict and dismiss the case because of the U.S. Supreme Courtโ€™s July presidential immunity ruling.

โ€œThere is no basis for continuing to rush,โ€ Blanche wrote.

Blanche sent the letter to Merchan on Wednesday after the judge rejected the defenseโ€™s latest request that he step aside from the case.

In the letter, Blanche reiterated the defense argument that the judge has a conflict of interest because his daughter works as a Democratic political consultant, including for Kamala Harris when she sought the 2020 presidential nomination. Harris is now running against Trump.

By adjourning the sentencing until after that election, โ€œthe Court would reduce, even if not eliminate, issues regarding the integrity of any future proceedings,โ€ Blanche wrote.

Election Day is Nov. 5, but many states allow voters to cast ballots early, with some set to start the process just a few days before or after Trumpโ€™s scheduled Sept. 18 sentencing date.

Merchan, who has said he is confident in his ability to remain fair and impartial, did not immediately rule on the delay request.

The Manhattan district attorneyโ€™s office, which prosecuted Trumpโ€™s case, declined to comment.

Trump was convicted in May of falsifying his businessโ€™ records to conceal a 2016 deal to pay off porn actor Stormy Daniels to stay quiet about her alleged 2006 sexual encounter with him. Prosecutors cast the payout as part of a Trump-driven effort to keep voters from hearing salacious stories about him during his first campaign.

Trump says all the stories were false, the business records were not and the case was a political maneuver meant to damage his current campaign. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is a Democrat.

Trumpโ€™s defense argued that the payments were indeed for legal work and so were correctly categorized.

Falsifying business records is punishable by up to four years behind bars. Other potential sentences include probation, a fine, or a conditional discharge which would require Trump to stay out of trouble to avoid additional punishment. Trump is the first ex-president convicted of a crime.

Trump has pledged to appeal, but that cannot happen until he is sentenced.

In a previous letter, Merchan set Sept. 18 for โ€œthe imposition of sentence or other proceedings as appropriate.โ€

Blanche argued in his letter seeking a delay that the quick turnaround from the scheduled immunity ruling on Sept. 16 to sentencing two days later is unfair to Trump.

To prepare for sentencing, Blanche argued, prosecutors will be submitting their punishment recommendation while Merchan is still weighing whether to dismiss the case on immunity grounds. If Merchan rules against Trump on the dismissal request, he will need โ€œadequate time to assess and pursue state and federal appellate options,โ€ Blanche said.

The Supreme Courtโ€™s immunity decision reins in prosecutions of ex-presidents for official acts and restricts prosecutors in pointing to official acts as evidence that a presidentโ€™s unofficial actions were illegal. Trumpโ€™s lawyers argue that in light of the ruling, jurors in the case should not have heard such evidence as former White House staffers describing how the then-president reacted to news coverage of the Daniels deal.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press

Source

Share X Facebook Email

The Daily Brief

The essential stories, without the noise.

A concise briefing delivered directly to your inbox.

Free to join. Unsubscribe any time.

Powered by Reach Response